Click for Menu

Club GringoMembers Only!

This is page is only for members of Club Gringo. If that's you, log in below.

You are already logged in!

Forgot your password?

Important Account Info

Your email address and password for Club Gringo are the same as your username and password for the Premium Course Area.

From now on, everything will be sync'd between both websites. When you update your password here, it'll automatically update there (and vice versa).

The PASSWORD RESET function works at both websites.

If you run into any problems, please email me.

Peaky Blinders #3

Series:

Context: The guys are swearing and Polly is trying to get them to stop.

Original English: I’m just saying there is no need.

Spanish subtitle: Solo digo que no hay motivo.

ISSUE #1: SOLO VS. SÓLO VS. SOLAMENTE

The subtitlers chose “solo” for “just”. The word “justo” does exist and means “just”.

But that’s “just” like “fair”.

This is the “just” like “only”. That’s why it’s “solo”.

They could’ve used “solamente” though.

As adverbs (like this) “solo” and “solamente” are exactly the same (and interchangeable).

“Sólo” is out there too. It’s also the same, but isn’t used much anymore (don’t worry about it).

ISSUE #2: DIGO VS. ESTOY DICIENDO

They chose “digo” for “I’m saying” instead of “estoy diciendo” even though Polly is in the middle of “saying”.

Unlike English, in Spanish, you can’t say “I’m eating” (estoy comiendo) unless you’re actually eating at that time.

But that doesn’t mean you HAVE TO, as this scene shows us.

The normal present tense (digo) is just the more common way of speaking.

This is SO easy to get used to, you might start speaking like it in English, “I go to store.”

ISSUE #3: QUE = NOTHING

Have you noticed in English, “that” can often be removed from a sentence without affecting it?

Actually, taking “that” out usually makes the sentence sound better!

Polly said, “I’m just saying there is no need.”

But she could’ve said, “I’m just saying THAT there is no need.” Now the “que” makes more sense, right?

In Spanish, it’s the same. Polly could’ve said the same thing without “que”: Solo digo, no hay motivo.

ISSUE #4: HAY

“Hay” means “there is” and “there are”. That’s weird at first.

It can be used for ONE thing: hay una cosa = there is one thing

And for more than one thing: hay dos cosas = there are two things

I guess “hay” comes from “haber”...

But to me, “hay” is just a word. It means “there is” and “there are”.

But it’s a cool word! It allows you to speak quicker, and isn’t hard to get used to.

ISSUE #5: MOTIVO = NEED

They chose “motivo” for “need” even though the word “necesidad” (need) exists.

Because the idea behind “need” in this case (the idea in Polly’s head) isn’t a “need” like food, water or shelter.

If Polly had said, “there is no reason” instead of “there is no need” -- they still could’ve used “motivo”.

But the subtitlers could’ve chosen “razón” (reason) instead of “motivo” too.

They use “motivo” a lot more in Spanish than we use “motive”. But “razón” is super common too.

Spanish Quickie: How Words Work

Tags: , , , , , ,